<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun-Times Smears Blogs for Smearing Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.achicagoblog.com/media/sun-times-smears-blogs-for-smearing-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.achicagoblog.com/media/sun-times-smears-blogs-for-smearing-obama/</link>
	<description>Living and breathing in the Second City</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.achicagoblog.com/media/sun-times-smears-blogs-for-smearing-obama/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.achicagoblog.com/?p=464#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I always try to give the reader a sense of how complete my knowledge is. If it's a rumor, I call it that. The question is, does reporting that there is a Rumor X, the same as confirming a rumor? I don't think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I always try to give the reader a sense of how complete my knowledge is. If it&#8217;s a rumor, I call it that. The question is, does reporting that there is a Rumor X, the same as confirming a rumor? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prying1</title>
		<link>http://www.achicagoblog.com/media/sun-times-smears-blogs-for-smearing-obama/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Prying1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.achicagoblog.com/?p=464#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>I've been guilty of repeating "rumors" but usually I qualify them as such right from the start. When I've been caught repeating a story that has no basis in truth I post a correction with links going back and forth between postings. 

Much of the MSM likes to put corrections where they will never be seen but worse than that they often leave out facts in their stories that might give people too much information and cause them to disagree with the liberal point of view.

But that's not lying is it? To just not tell ALL the story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been guilty of repeating &#8220;rumors&#8221; but usually I qualify them as such right from the start. When I&#8217;ve been caught repeating a story that has no basis in truth I post a correction with links going back and forth between postings. </p>
<p>Much of the MSM likes to put corrections where they will never be seen but worse than that they often leave out facts in their stories that might give people too much information and cause them to disagree with the liberal point of view.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not lying is it? To just not tell ALL the story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
