Living and breathing in the Second City
I don’t mean to gang up on Illinois Reason, but I just can’t swallow this argument:
…What happens when one side of the political spectrum, through fetid ranting over the course of a great many years, foments rage and anger and promotes and even glorifies violence in order to ‘pump up their base of voters’?
Idiots try to assassinate a presidential candidate, that’s what happens.
This is unconscionable hyperbole. And besides, the rhetoric from the right, while negative has hardly been hate filled. I haven’t heard a single person truly impugn Obama’s character. Not like they did Clinton’s in past years.
Finally, even if they had, IR’s argument misunderstands politics. Politicians don’t get out in front of character assassination, they get behind it. If there is a whisper campaign going around that Obama is a Muslim, politicians will exploit it for sure, but the fact the whisper campaign exists in the first place is a symptom of a deeper psychosis in the American public and the American media.
We simply care more about winning arguments (and elections) than we do communicating and understanding. And on this score, Illinois Reason is no different.
Hat Tip: Windy City Pundit
The fog comes
on little cat feet.
It sits looking
over harbor and city
on silent haunches
and then moves on.
-Carl Sandburg
Rob_N
August 27th, 2008 at 11:02 am
Mike, thanks for the discussion.
I think you, like Mark at Windy Pundit, are missing my point.
My full reply is on Illinois Reason.
Rob_N
August 27th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
PS: …You’re conflating several issues.
You wrote: “And besides, the rhetoric from the right, while negative has hardly been hate filled. I haven’t heard a single person truly impugn Obama’s character.”
While the plot, such as it is, may have been against Obama for any number of reasons (given what the media has reported, likely because of racial background) conservative pundits certainly have been impugning the character of progressives for decades — from President Reagan’s “lunatic left” statement to Ann Coulter’s book “Treason”, etc.
Had Reagan said “lunatic libertarians” and had Coulter called you and your colleagues “traitors” would you be as forgiving?