Living and breathing in the Second City
One thing I thought particularly interesting in John McCain’s speech last night was the fine line he walked on the issue of partisanship. Here he is, nominee of the Republican Party. But he’s been running against the party since the 2000 primary election. So here he is, the maverick, representing the incumbent party and still trying to position himself as the agent of “change.” To be fair, he’s probably 100 percent earnest in his vision of change, and yet it does disrupt our usual narratives about politics. And the media clearly doesn’t know how to handle it. We can’t have two people running on change. If it were anyone else, the incumbent party’s change-rhetoric would be seen as cynical posturing. But not with McCain.
So we somehow have two candidates running on change, both of who represent the status quo in some small way.
The fog comes
on little cat feet.
It sits looking
over harbor and city
on silent haunches
and then moves on.
-Carl Sandburg
elgin illinois
September 6th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Selecting Palin was a brilliant stroke that underlined the message and allowed him to seize the word “reform.” That’s really what he has to own, not ‘change’ and ‘hope’ which are already taken by Obama. ‘Reform’ is the word and it’s a better word, because it implies positive change. Palin has a reputation as a reformer, while McCain has a reputation of maverick, so they go well together.
As long as they stick by the word ‘reform’ I think the media will fall in line and start describing that as the message from the McCain side, while Obama will still be shackled with the less effective ‘change’ mantle.
In a race between the ‘reform’ candidate and the ‘change’ candidate, I think the reformer wins.
Austin Barrow
September 6th, 2008 at 9:36 pm
elgin, only a supporter of McCain could pull off that logic.
Austin Barrow
September 6th, 2008 at 9:37 pm
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&title=sarah-palin-gender-card
You’ve got to watch this. It’s HILARIOUS!
T.J. Schwab
September 8th, 2008 at 9:10 am
I believe Austin has taken the all-too-familiar, self-preservation based, artistic plunge to the depths of the faux liberal fan club. As for the linked Stewart video - I would hardly call Rove and O’Reilly champions of conservatism - though I am certain the ideology ignorant (of both sides) would peddle otherwise.
Qui Nguyen
September 8th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
And I believe TJ just took the all too familiar trapped-in-a-corner conservative stance at taking a personal pot shot at Austin. Love ya, man, but I gotta call it like I sees it.
And, come on, in Austin’s defense - Elgin is debating between the words “reform” and “change”. Come on, that’s not really deep political insight, now is it? That’s stoner insight. Well, if it was insightful at all.
Jackie W
September 20th, 2008 at 12:21 am
I have to say we have heard that word ‘reform’ bandied about quite a bit. What are McCain and Palin, or as Palin says, ‘Palin and McCain’ going to do? Get rid of everyone in the Republican Party? Is that the master plan for ‘reform?’
Mike
September 21st, 2008 at 9:11 am
Good point Jackie. I would say that both McCain and Obama have been a little ambiguous about what they would actually change about the culture in Washington. And McCain has been at it for so long I think he gets a little bit of a free pass from the media.